Genres Horror. Writers Gianfranco Clerici. Size 5. Additional terms Terms of transaction. Windows Windows 8, Windows 8. Feb 04, Never once, in a million years, would I have ever said that M. Night Shyamalan, in , would've made a better horror movie than Eli Roth. But alas today is the day where the impossible is possible. Shyamalan has made a better horror movie than Eli Roth and there's nothing wrong with that. This, really, is Cannibal Holocaust for the modern era.
The film, however, much like No Escape, is really retrograde in its approach to how it chooses to portray the indigenous tribe that serve as the main antagonists of the film.
I don't think it's nearly as bad as No Escape, in that at least this film depicts the struggle against the tribe and those that are trying to kill them off in order to exploit the land they live on and its resources.
Honestly that, in reality, is the bigger issue. And this is something Roth explained this when the film faced some criticism due to its portrayal as indigenous people as savages. I'm not saying the film isn't without its flaws, but it also, at the very least, attempts to use this approach in order to shine a light on a much bigger issue.
The film is fairly meta in the way that it uses its narrative as activism. Of course, that's not something that the majority of people will remember, or eve completely get, from this movie. The film criticizes those who use activism as a PR stunt and how sometimes the good guys and the bad guys are more in-tune than they would like for people to know. The problem is however that I think there's a lot of filler in the lead-up to the group being caught by the tribe. While there's the exposition that is necessary to set everything up, I just think there's too much that just feels like it's there to artificially extend the length of the film.
For what reason, I really have no idea, but, to me, there's a lot of scenes in the film that could've been trimmed down a little bit. The film does kick off the horror with a bang, though, the plane crash itself is fairly gory, well the first death is at least. And then there's the scene where they pretty much dismember a character to take his meat to consume. The problem is, however, that every death after that point sort of pales in comparison.
Nothing comes close, so they pretty much blew their wad right out of the gate. And I get why they did it, you want to show the people how utterly nasty and brutal this tribe can be, but it also meant that everything after that never came close to that brutality. The film is, obviously, still really gory, but it just peaks way too early. There's also a fairly gruesome, and surprising, throat slit scene. I thought the segments with the tribe, while not perfect, were pretty solid all things considered.
I think it works in that, because anything like this is unlikely to ever happen to anyone reading this, it's also not something that would be an entirely unrealistic scenario to someone. This is more likely to happen than an actual, literal demon possessing someone's body. So I can see someone looking and this and just being terrified. If it wasn't for the first half of the film dragging so much, this would've gotten a better rating. The stuff with the tribe is good, it manages to keep your attention.
The character development, of course, is minimal. The only one that really resembles anything of an actual human would be Alejandro. He's the only real interesting character in the film because his views on activism, after being captured by the tribe, does show to be a fraud and someone who's using activism to raise his own profile and ego under the guise of attempting to do good.
No one else really has anything interesting to say or even do. The film's ending, before credits start rolling, is quite good and, again, it sort ends up helping to fulfill the mission that they set out to complete in the first place. In a more roundabout and violent way, but they did accomplish it, even if it took some lies. The post-credits scene, however, is a little goofy.
I won't spoil it, but it just looks silly. Because [the filmmakers produced] Cannibal Holocaust in thick in the Amazon jungle back in Which is a tale unto itself. Indeed, Cannibal Holocaust comes with its own mythology and mysteries. It consisted of tribesmen tying one of their own to a log and then dipping him into the piranha-infested river.
On a trip to the Amazon before Covid hit, Waddell confirmed the filmmakers rehearsed the scene. And he a witness insisted the crew actually filmed it. Where is the piranha scene? Trivia Ten days after its premiere in Milan, the film was seized by the Italian courts, and director Ruggero Deodato was arrested and charged with obscenity. He was later charged with murdering several actors on camera, and faced life in prison.
The cast had signed contracts requiring them to disappear for a year after shooting, to maintain the illusion that they'd died. Deodato contacted Luca Barbareschi and told him to contact the three other actors who played the missing film team. When the actors appeared in court, alive and well, the murder charges were dropped. Goofs The snake that bites the jungle guide in his boot is said to be poisonous.
It's a red-tail boa constrictor, a non-poisonous snake that strangles its prey. Quotes Professor Harold Monroe : I wonder who the real cannibals are. Crazy credits In the opening credits: "For the sake of authenticity some of the sequences have been retained in their entirety. Alternate versions The Grindhouse Releasing re-release, as well as the DVD, features a scrolling warning before the film from the company stating that the film is uncut and uncensored and while they do not support the "artistic decisions" of the film, they do support free speech.
It also plays part of Riz Ortolani's music score in the background. Connections Edited into Through Eyes of the Dead User reviews Review. Top review. Sympathy for the devil. Data Rating. Decebalus pe 17 Decembrie Filmul filmat in stil documentar este un adevarat capitol intreg in istoria horror gore - adica muuuult sirop de cirese : Intr-adevar este filmul care a ingrozit o planeta, nu atat prin scenele sangeroase cat prin semnul mare de intrebare pe care-l pune umanitatii si asa zisei civilizatii o omului modern.
Halloween pe 28 iulie Nu sunt de parere ca nu trebuie urmarit, dar nici ca trebuie sa luam prea in serios un film de genul asta.
Eu unul l-am vazut accidental si nu il pot recomanda nimanui pentru ca m-ar fi impresionat peste masura. Este totusi un freak movie, un fel de femeia cu barba a cinematografiei recente.
Pentru cei interesati sa stie ca exista si altceva, cu totul altceva, in afara filmelor pe care le poti urmari cu placere, relaxare sau chiar cu un efort antrenant al mintii, acest excesiv de interzis film poate insemna un punct de reper. Repet: nu e un film care sa iti faca placere, sa te relaxeze, nu e filosofic. E un film de urmarit o singura data si de recomandat prietenilor cu o simpla sugestie: "daca vreti sa vedeti o ciudatenie de film Vorador pe 08 Iulie Este incredibil cum un film de acum 30 de ani,a putut sa ma socheze atat de mult,nu e de mirare ca a fost interzis in mai multe tari.
Cea ce m-a socat cel mai rau nu au fost scenele de nuditate sau masacrul dintre oameni,si ca violenta asupra animalelor din film este reala,au fost unele momente in care imi era greu sa privesc.
Chiar daca are un mesaj de transmis,acela ca omul modern poate fi uneori mai barbar decat cei din evul mediu,nu prea il recomand,nu ramai cu nimic important in minte,poate doar cu scarba si dezgust fata de cei care au aparut in el. Lobont pe 21 Decembrie Probabil cel mai socant film facut vreodata in istoria cinematografiei.
Contine tot: canibalism, omucideri, dezmembrari, castrari, avorturi, violuri
0コメント